July 24, 2008

Record access agreement reached in Australia

Herald Sun: Rio Tinto to buy ore and keep third parties off tracks

Buy the Australian juniors that are on the rail lines. A solution has been reached on rail access. This is huge news for the small stranded resources. The question, of course, is, what is the rail head price? This just opens the flood gates for the junior Pilbara players and gives them a clear path to revenue.

July 24, 2008

Basic rule of law needed in Russia

An investment gets trapped in Kremlin’s vise

Very scary article on Russia. As resource prices go up, expect more and more to be taken back by the locals. Russia is ahead of the curve, but just you all wait, others will catch up. At least this guy is out and is not spending his time in Russian jails. I am, of course, not sure who is right, but this on top of BP’s troubles, points to a clear case of nationalization. Heck, you all know what comes next.

July 23, 2008

More CSN (and the bidders are unknown)

Reuters India: Russians, Japanese vie for CSN unit

Ok, well, not unknown, but we are not certain who they are. There are a couple separate lists provided by different people, so I tend to not trust them. The valuation numbers are more interesting. We are seeing a $10 billion price tag for the whole project or $6.7 billion for two-thirds. Of course if you read my blog, you would have already known that. (See this post.) I called $7.2 billion for two-thirds, so I was a bit off. Let’s see where it ends up. The liquidity crisis we are under right now is going to lower the number of bidders because anyone who would be bidding with borrowed money–JSW, Tata, and others–is not going to be able to make a bid. I expect that the Chinese or the Japanese have the least need to go to the banks, and that might make them the winner.

Sorry I have been writing less. Now that we have the top 10, I am going to aim for one to two editorials a week. I am not going to find short news articles and write about them in the quick blurb style as others are quicker and funnier at that.

July 21, 2008

Feeling the pain of inflation across the globe

At some point, inflation is going to hurt everyone, but it hurts people differently. This is because inflation is in essence measured alongside a basket of goods and services. From country to country, people spend different proportions of their income on raw materials, processed goods, and services. The question I want to look at is, what is the cost of raw materials as a percent of GDP, and how does that impact the consumer?

In America, people complain if gas prices go up $2 per gallon, and I understand their pain. I am feeling it every time I fly. My wife feels it every time she fills up our van’s gas tank. Putting aside the flight costs for the moment, let’s look at the math of how gas prices are affecting people like my wife who drive a lot. She drives a van that gets 20 miles per gallon about 20,000 miles per year. So my wife uses 1,000 gallons of gas a year driving around the kid-hauler. She buys regular gas, and she is now paying on average $4.30 a gallon. Assuming gas prices stay at $4.30, she’ll spend about $4,300 this year on gas. Last year, gas prices were a high $2.40 per gallon, so she would have spent $2,400 on gas if we had not lived in Israel at the time. So this year she is spending an additional $1,900 for the privilege of not staying home and going stir crazy.

Now let’s apply that cost increase to a family with an income slightly above the American average, say $60,000. On a take-home basis, that family is losing an additional $158 a month to gas costs against a gross income of $5,000 a month. On net income, it is probably a bit worse. That family is losing 3-4% of their net income to gas.

Now let’s flip commodities and countries. In China, they consume probably 275 kg of steel per capita per year. That translates to 440 kg of iron ore. Now the price of ore went up around $40 per tonne in China. So that mythical Chinese person is losing $16 in purchasing power to get the same steel. It takes 250 kg of coking coal for a tonne of steel, and the price of such coal went up $200 per tonne, for another $50 in lost purchasing power.

Now you might say, so they lost $66 per person, that does not matter, but that is 9% inflation on steel raw materials alone. And that is without freight or fuel. When you add in the freight jump it is worse, and with the fuel jump it is even scarier. The total inflation gets to be a bad burden when you figure that it affects everything a person consumes: raw materials, fuel, food, and everything else.

I do not notice when rice doubles in price. Not that much of my caloric intake comes from rice. And not that much of my income goes toward food, relative to my other expenses. If food goes up in cost by 30% on a macro sense, and as an average American I am spending 6% of my budget on food, the percent of my income I spend on food only will go to 7.8%.

However, if you were in Asia and spending 30% of your budget on food, an increase of 30% in food prices would be a much bigger problem. Suddenly, you would be looking at your food bill taking up 39% of your budget, a significant increase.

As I said before, inflation is in essence measured by a basket of goods and services. The American basket, with 6% of our money going to food, and x for fuel is completely different from those of people in the rest of the world. The reason, of course, is simple. People in other parts of the world spend a lot less on finished goods and a much higher percentage of their money on the basic raw materials that form a life. We in America do not, on the whole, buy rice. We buy rice mix. We also make a whole lot more than most other people in the world, so rice mix costs us a lot less, relative to our income, than rice costs the poor guy working in Shanghai with a wheelbarrow to make a living.

So what is the issue that I see here? At some point, inflation is going to bite the emerging market expansions in the rear and cause people to curtail basic spending. If we’re lucky, a feedback loop will take care of the problem: People buying fewer items will be enough to just slow down inflation and growth. But if we’re not lucky, spending will decrease so much that growth will nearly grind to a halt. That would be a hard landing.

I think my wife at this point can afford the gas she spends to drive. I worry a lot more about the rice bowl in China and if is it staying full. And I worry even more about the bowl of food in Africa, where a lack of food can cause political instability and war. If you cannot afford to feed your kids and they go hungry, you probably will do anything to put food in their mouths.

People will not riot for lack of gas for the car, but they will kill others to feed their own kids. Let’s hope that the feedback loops will avert that from happening. In the long term this is not a zero sum game, but it can sure feel like one in the short term.

July 16, 2008

Top ten stories for July 16, 2008

1. Bloomberg.com: Cleveland-Cliffs to buy Alpha Natural for $10 billion
Introducing an all-in-one stop ‘n’ shop store for steelmakers. Iron ore producer Cleveland-Cliffs plans to buy coal mining firm Alpha Natural to create a merged Cliffs Natural Resources.

2. ABS-CBN: Nickel mine firm asks PSE to suspend Oriental
Whistle-blowing, accusations against Oriental Peninsula Resource Group. Nickel mining company Platinum Group Metals has called upon the Philippine Stock Exchange to investigate Oriental’s improper disclosure of mining operations in Palawan. Platinum Group Metals claims it has juridical possession of the mineral property involved.

3. Times Online: Rio Tinto iron ore output hits record high
Good news for Rio could spell trouble for BHP bid. Fueled by strong demand from China, Rio celebrates its second quarter iron ore output rise of 13%.

4. The Seattle Times: Judge: Mining company liable for pollution at former uranium mine
The Newport Mining Corporation was ordered to help pay for pollution cleanup at a former uranium mine on the Spokane Indian Reservation. A judge found Newport liable for costs as it maintained partial control of mining operations through subsidiary Dawn Mining.

5. The Australian: Unknown buyer takes $15.5 million stake in Cape Lambert Iron Ore
A masked iron ore crusader? In the final stages of its sale to China Metallurgical Group Corporation, Cape Lambert Iron Ore had a recent unknown buyer take a 14% stake in the company. The interest, worth $15.5 million, was conducted through Merrill Lynch (Australia) representation.

6. Reuters India: India steel firms keen to raise prices, government watching
Indian steelmakers are looking to come closer in line with the global steel market and account for increased input costs by raising prices. The government shows concern over inflation and plans to keep close attention on steel market.

7. The Sydney Morning Herald: Portmans not interested in Golden West
An interesting squabble is brewing in Australia. Iron ore producer Portmans is bartering their 19.9% stake in iron ore explorer Golden West to leverage a shake-up in Golden West’s leadership. Portmans is calling a shareholders meeting to remove the current executive chairman and director; it denies claims that it is looking to take over.

8. Business Day: Gold is bright spot on JSE as platinum falls
Platinum dulls in a golden market. Gold’s impressive performance couldn’t balance the massive 7.31% drop on the platinum mining index on Africa’s JSE market.

9. Ontario First Nations demand firm right to say ‘no’ to mining developments
Ontario’s Mining Act of 1873 is undergoing revisions this week to require local Aboriginal communities’ consultation and consent before mining. Also announced was a plan to protect half of the Northern Boreal region from development. Any development on the remaining land would need approval from the First Nations.

10. Reuters: Australia considers first new coal port in 25 years
Queensland has opened discussions about building new coal mines and an export terminal, investments that could increase export capacity by 40%. Environmental groups have raised concerns about the proposal, arguing it would contradict Australia’s soon-to-be unveiled carbon emissions trading scheme that would reshape the economy to make it less reliant on coal based energy.

July 16, 2008

Cliffs continues to surprise

Cleveland-Cliffs and Alpha Natural Resources to merge, creating Cliffs Natural Resources, a leading diversified mining and natural resources company

Now, finally, Cliffs is out spending its seed corn. The question is, will it get returns from it? What has protected Cliffs in the past from takeover is its horribly structured off-take contracts. Why would Mittal, for example, want to buy out someone who gives it cheap ore already? That protection will have less value as the iron ore business becomes a smaller part of the whole, so the question I ask is, is this a clean up to get taken out by the Russians, or maybe Xstrata? At some point, the combination represents a real chance for someone to get a nice slice of two business groups that represent value.

Xstrata and Anglo both have to grow or else be eaten, maybe some North American iron ore and coal is what’s for dinner?

Benjamin

July 15, 2008

Top ten stories for July 15, 2008

1. The Economic Times: Moving iron ore by rail cheaper
Iron glides on steel as more ore hits the rails. Railroads help cushion rising input prices. Indian railways issue a 25% discount for domestic iron ore transportation to ports in an attempt to help steelmakers.

2. Reuters UK: Russia’s Mechel says Q1 net soars to $500 million
No more (iron) curtains to make, but profit to take. Double net profit earnings for Russian coking coal miner Mechel. Strong growth leads to a first quarter $500 million net profit windfall. Favorable conditions are expected to continue.

3. Bloomberg.com: JSW in talks to acquire United Coal, other U.S. mines
Indian steelmaker JSW placed an initial $2 billion bid for United Coal. Interest in the coal mine is part of an attempt to secure supplies after recent price rises of steel inputs. JSW is also looking at other U.S. mines.

4. Reuters Africa: Shanghai copper down with thin volume, zinc eases
U.S housing problems and slowing Chinese consumption are at the top of analysts’ explanations for copper’s declining demand and price. The Shanghai Futures Exchange saw copper prices down 0.3% with weak trading volume.

5. CNN Money: Rio Tinto to supply Wal-Mart with gold, silver
Frodo gets a new, always-low-priced ring thanks to Rio and Wal-Mart. The mining company has agreed to supply gold and silver to the world’s largest retailer for a new traceable line of jewelry. The financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

6. Reuters India: Asia gold –sales of scrap pick up, bullion near four-month high
Gold trading still active in Asian markets. Current spot prices for gold hover in the high $900s, and some some are expecting another break of the $1,000-an-ounce barrier.

7. The London Free Press: Gold firm goes drilling for oil
Barrick switches to self-service stations. Barrick Gold Corporation hopes to acquire oil company Cadence Energy in an attempt to lower its energy costs.

8. Bloomberg.com: Diamonds attract funds as largest gem prices surge 76% in year
Diamonds are an investor’s best friend. The market for diamond investing is growing—high-value diamonds such as blue and pink diamonds have increased 75-100% in price over the past year.

9. The Canberra Times: India is hungry for our uranium
Renewed talks between the U.S. and India of civil nuclear cooperation illuminate global uranium tensions. Australia reviews its relationship with India and its current position to not sell uranium directly to the country, also evaluates stance on India’s possible induction into the global civil nuclear regime.

10. Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Diamond mine budget doubles
Despite doubled projected costs, diamond miner Argyle Diamond continues with plans to move from open cut to underground mining at its Western Australian location.

July 15, 2008

Chinese sell out of U.S. project to Cliffs

PR-Insider.com: Cleveland-Cliffs updates 2008 iron ore revenue-per-ton guidance; provides commentary on 2009 North American iron ore pricing

Reuters: Cleveland-Cliffs buys out minority holder in Minnesota

What is 30% of 5.2 million tonnes of U.S. pellet production worth? Apparently a whole lot of money. Let’s break down the math. Cleveland-Cliffs bought 30% of United Taconite from Laiwu for $100 million + 1.5 million shares + 1.2 million tonnes of seaborne pellets. That’s $100 million in cash, $167 million in shares, and $168 million in pellets (assuming the pellets are from Wabush and worth $140 per tonne). So, the total price Cliffs is paying is US$435 million.

Now United Taconite has 5.2 million tonnes of production, and 30% of that is 1.56 million tonnes of production. Cliffs is estimating North American Pellet prices to be $85. (I could devote a whole blog to the silly North American pricing model.) Costs are $56, so the margin per tonne is $29. The earnings from this stake in United Taconite pre-tax are US$44 million. So Cliffs paid 9.9 times the pre-tax earnings of this stake to buy it. This is a very good price considering that Cliffs trades for a price-earnings ratio well in excess of that.

The interesting bit here is not that Cliffs bought this, but that the Chinese sold out. Apparently they felt that they could get better returns elsewhere. I can understand the attraction of the cash to the Chinese. This is hard currency that is outside of China, and it probably can be reinvested outside of China into other things without government control. I would expect to see Laiwu go out and buy something now. The question is, just what? They can leverage, so I would expect something with a US$1.2 billion price tag—could be a mini mill, a coal mine, or maybe some ships.